Yankui-Huizhu is a state-themed cult created by "Kamerad Hasyim" or written in PnW as Abu Hasyim Huizhu. The cult theme was chosen for purely realistic reasons:
- It is a game of states that is determined entirely by the will of the player who created the state. Without the people truly determining the population, there is no historical reason to claim the existence of "people's power" as occurs in the dialectical historical materialism. The state becomes a phenomenal world of ideas, so the historical forces that exist are the contradictions of ideas, not classes. Hegel's world works better here.
- Ideas are instruments of the state without the people determining them and ideas come entirely from state makers. So, just as in MDH the ruling class in the state is the one who controls the means of production as an economic instrument, so here the state rulers are the ones who control ideas as an instrument of the state's existence.
- The states in this game were created solely to actualize the creator himself as a human being.
In conclusion, the leader of a state is the creator of the state and its people itself based on his own ideas and thoughts, also this situation is his self-actualization. then the state itself, however democratic it may be, is a cult of ideas and the personality that produces those ideas.
So what is it? It's literally Realism!
And if this view is converted into an ideology that can be adopted by all citizens, it will be like this:
- The supreme leader is a manifestation of the "creator" whose will has implications for reality. Even the revolutionary will of the people is a representation of the leader who wants a certain stability. There is no power of the people other than by the leader and only the leader is the cause of historical development. Reality has become the world of the leader's phenomenal ideas and the power of history is the contradiction of his ideas.
- These ideas have made the State an existential instrument. So the state is an instrument of the people's existence as part of a reality that is separate from the people themselves. The people are the existence because of which the state as an instrument can function, and therefore the people exist as a representation of idea
- Ideas are the actualization of the creator and reality is its manifestation. So the ideas of the supreme leader are reality in the form of ideas. The people as a whole come into being because of their ideas and maintain their existence with their ideas.
Implementation[]
The Supreme Leader wrote about whether the Three Principles of Realism should be spread:
The dissemination of an idea requires a fundamental question as to why the idea should be disseminated. Ideas, like genetic nature, have a tendency to maintain their existence, and disseminating themselves is the way ideas maintain their existential existence. This fact is a fact that every realist believes and we always promote our ideas [...] However, some people think that disseminating ideas means expecting the idea to be implemented by others to replace previous practices, as in the ideological war that once existed. This assumption is completely wrong. Our Realist Principle is an awareness of reality that can be a guide to responding to reality appropriately. And because all parties are real material realities, they are unconsciously not free from the laws of the realist principles in our ideology. There is no society that claims to be democratic that does not create scenarios of who will be candidates and who will win. There is no society that claims to implement a free market without preparing scenarios for every periodic fluctuation and crisis that may occur in the market mechanism. They can all be easily explained in our realist principles that reveal these facts. So the dissemination of ideas that we do is a mission of enlightenment, not salvation or justice. Those who are not yet aware will be made aware, and those who are aware but still claim to be democratic, liberal, free market, and so on should not be forced for their hypocritical attitude. Because playing as a hypocrite is also a reality in itself.
The Three Principles of Realism have been criticized by critics as pseudo-religious, a cult of personality, and supremacist. These claims generally appear with reference to the supreme leader's statement in the same statement:
Although it means that they all are manifestations of the will of the supreme leader as the manifestation of the creator, it does not mean that all are actually equal. A nation whose manifestation comes from a supreme leader who brings more real socialism is a progressive and superior supreme leader, while a leader who chooses hypocrisy and brings the manifestation of a nation that feels sadness and suffering is an old-fashioned and inferior leader. How fortunate is a person who is under an inferior leader to find the negligence of his leader that allows him to defect to the superior supreme leader.
Stability and Conservatism[]
According to an official government broadcast, one of the news items featured an interview with students about the Yankui doctrine. The following is the text:
#1 We Enjoy Stability
In reopening Yankui broadcasts to the world, the broadcaster interviewed a political science student to ask for his opinion on Yankui's socio-political situation for international coverage.
Q: "In your opinion, how can the international community understand Yankui's socio-political situation?"
A: "In my opinion, Yankui's socio-political situation has been very stable for a long time. Although closed off, we were able to meet our daily needs by enjoying the fruits of the Seunrima Movement (long-term planning and mass industrialization by the Honorable Leader) before the country closed itself off. While the outside world experienced various upheavals of conflict and power struggles, the people of Yankui maintained their trust in the Honorable Leader."
Q: "What kind of trust?"
A: "I believe that honesty with the Honorable Leader will bring this country to the greatest possible stability. If we look at global conflicts, they are all driven by the will of their respective leaders. The difference is, stability doesn't suit the interests of many leaders. In politics, they often manipulate society as if they were arguing in a democracy, when in fact, the final outcome is always predetermined by a pattern of vested interests. Imperialist wars also become a profitable political path for some. This is different from the Yankui people, whose citizens are honest about their interests, and the Honorable Leader is also honest about his. We and the Honorable Leader are an organic whole. Without the Honorable Leader, there would be no country, no people, and we would be wiped off the map like the previous civilizations that once inhabited this land. Our existence is our freedom, and our freedom is the curse of our existence."
Q: "But isn't that a Conservative stance that contradicts the Honorable Leader's revolutionary and socialist course?"
A: "Conservative stance? I'm not sure if the terminology Conservative is still relevant in our political discussions, now that we understand social manipulation. In reality, all social movements serve the legitimate or dishonest interests of their leaders. Whatever their direction, they all ultimately lead to maintaining the existential continuity of a nation's society, united by its leaders. Therefore, the stance of all citizens is fundamentally Conservative. If we understand it from a class perspective, the Yankui State has been socialist since its inception. Others, however, have evolved from kingdoms, bourgeois republics, and so on. What about slave societies? I've never heard of them. As far as I know, civilizations emerge and disappear in an instant, as if the existential continuity of a nation doesn't arise from class conflict, even though class conflict does exist as a form of social manipulation. Therefore, the distinction between Conservative and Progressive becomes irrelevant due to our paradigm shift regarding the Continuity of Social Stability."
Q: "Does that have anything to do with the history of our Nation's Exodus?"
A: "Of course there is. In historical research, we all agree that the Matzliach Exodus from the Gear continent is a historical anomaly. The reason, of course, is that there was no compelling reason for millions of people to immediately move continents. We are a socialist country, and our needs were still met at the time. The only recorded reason is that the Honorable Leader wanted it, and suddenly the map changed. This serves as scientific evidence of our state doctrine."
Q: "Then what do you think of the Honorable Leader's recent decision to dissolve the Confederation and form a Unitary State?"
A: "Let me ask you back, have you noticed any particular changes in our lives?"
Q: "I don't think so."
A: "So am I. In fact, the Confederation has long been merely a political formality. In reality, Confederations, Federations, and other non-unitary forms are largely irrelevant. In advanced capitalist countries, economic practices are centralized in the form of large corporations that consolidate mass production and concentrate capital in a single location. States actually experience significant disparities. What we see as a Federal State today is a set of laws that allows the petty and middle bourgeoisie in poorer states to breathe more freely into the free market and develop their region's economic potential. However, that is very different from the early Federation, and we don't even need a Federation to do so. Likewise, our country, which has been centralized from the start in a socialist economy and implemented a set of autonomy. The Confederation was created as an administrative symbol for each nation in Yankui. Once they were assimilated, that function was relegated to autonomous state institutions. The Confederation is no longer needed, and autonomy continues to operate within a "democratic" framework. This is our Democratic Centralism.
Q: "Okay." "So, do you have a message for the international community watching this broadcast?"
A: "I'm sure the listeners understand what I'm saying. However, in the future, the direction of Honorable Leader Yankui's foreign policy will change in a direction I don't know. However, I hope that fellow nations will get to know each other and become brothers in the brotherhood of nations worldwide."